Click here to go back to the home page Click here to see our foolish and drunken attempts at humour Click here to read our humiliation of the worst cinematic abortions the movie industry has to offer Click here to see some of the most bizarre news the web's ever puked out Click here to see the barrage of other crap we have lying around


A quick summary of this year's Cannes Film Festival: it's fucking morbid.

Welcome, one and all, to what is unquestionably the least important Cannes round-up you'll read this year...


Cannes is back. Cannes is sexy. Cannes is the now, hip, trendy place to be. All the cool kids are talking about it. And by 'all the cool kids' I mean Me. We jilted folk of TwistedEdge haven't looked under the slimy rock that is cinema for quite some time, but this perky French festival of film has got us feverishly reaching for the keyboard once again - and not for the reasons you might expect.

I've read a little bit about Cannes film festival this year, and it all seems rather dreary like we've come to expect - failed homosexuals in loud shirts eating oysters, lots of arthouse movies about small, thin men penetrating each other, and swarms of people with far too much knowledge of patisserie. If you could stab Cannes in the heart it would bleed champagne. Or at least I think it would, I've never been. I've got better things to do.

Don't get me wrong, I love film festivals - and apart from Sundance, Cannes has the biggest and best reputation for kicking ass and taking names. I could go on and on about its storied history, its glamorous past, its many nuances but I don't want to bore you or insult your intelligence. If you cared that much, you'd have been there in person.
Like most people, dear reader, you're probably above all the ass-biting and cuddles that festivals like this encourage. Good on you. You are, after all, reading a website that specialises in chicks from slasher movies, directors with a fetish for chainsaws and actors who have an uncanny knack in biting people.

I read about it though, in an attempt to appear cultured and sophisticated, and so that unsuspecting readers would foolishly buy me as an expert, rather than some power-crazed hyperactive fanboy on a spree.

But hey, since when did knowledge become a part of journalism, right? I too can do a Cannes report, and just like the others before me, I too have no clue what's going on, what the hell any of the films mean, what the heck any of the directors are talking about, or even where the hell Cannes even is. Besides, unlike most of the Cannes journalists floating around out there, I've actually found something you might be interested in (more on that later).

The big winner this year was apparently a film called Uncle Boonmee which, if I've read it right, is about a bunch of Thai chaps who run around a lot, make funny noises, stare into space and generally do things that make no sense to anyone outside of the proverbial arthouse crackpipe. The cast were all either acting their pants off, under some kind of hoodoo, or shitfaced - nobody can tell which, and nobody seems to care.

Impressed with a switch in pace away from buggery, the Cannes film board gave it lots of shiny trophies and gave director Apitchatpong Weerasethakul plaudits mainly for having a hilariously unpronounceable name. The film, apparently, has much to say on the nature of life, mortality and the soul - which is code for 'nobody knows what the hell is going on'. But it's foreign, ridiculous, pretentious as hell and will doubtless be embraced lovingly by espresso drinkers and turtle-neck wearers everywhere.

We've come to expect this kind of thing for Cannes - what was at one stage a revered and solemn monolith of film critique and expression has now become little more than a holding pen for the culturally obnoxious, vegans, pretentious art school drop-outs and Socialists. I probably sound like I'm lashing the festival with ridiculous stereotypes and unfair generalisations. I'm not.

Read up for yourselves if you please - this year's affair was so full of misguided, snobbish goodwill that people were even applauding the crap movies, rather than doing the traditional thing of lynching the director. I swear to God they could lock the audience in a big, dark room and show them all of last year's films and nobody would notice. What would happen if they were to play one of the movies backwards, just for kicks? Would anybody mind?

As part of the five minutes of tireless research I did for this article, I did a quick Google search for 'Arthouse Cinema' and came up with the following images, which pretty much summarise the kind of films the public has come to expect from the Cannes Film Festival:

 

A moody-looking woman stares longingly at the floor. She will continue to do so for the next 2 hours, occasionally sighing. Critics will applaud the subtle use of emotion as a backdrop to the fragility of today's society. We normal viewers are just wondering when she'll get her tits out.
 

You'd be surprised how many scenes there are like this in arthouse; here we see our gallant hero, dressed like a pimp, objecting to the fact there's chimney-sweep from Victorian England in his house threatening to fuck him to death with a screwdriver. Happens all the time...
 
 

This is the kind of film Cannes aficionados seem to druel over. It takes true mastery to bring you the unparalleled misery that comes with a 3 hour film about people crying, hugging, crying, moaning and then crying some more.

 

This one isn't even from Cannes, but amused me shitless anyway. Every website should have a random image of two pricks in matching slacks jumping about for no apparent reason - and now mine has! Hooray! Another mountain climbed.
 
It's not all buggery, tears and anguish however.

You see, there's a movie in this year's festival that everybody knows is awesome but none of the Cannes judges have given much love to - principally because it's fun and full of shooting and swearing and other such candy that people actually enjoy. It's a film riddled with that foible known as Entertainment which seems a bane amongst the arthouse set, despite being by it's very nature the reason for making films in the first place.

It's a movie called Outrage, by an angry Oriental fellow called 'Beat' Takeshi Kitano. Kitano, a man who delights in making people's faces explode so gooey, splodgey red bits land on the camera lens. Kitano, who delights in nothing less than a bloody orgy of murder filled with immaculately dressed Japanese shooting each other to death for no apparent reason. Kitano, a screaming wake up call reminding people of why cinemas exist in the first place - to entertain those who kindly bought a ticket. Kitano, a man who knows that films about apathy, doubt, tears and soul-searching redemption are best left to the French.

I mean, just look at this fucking picture:

What more do we need to know? Takeshi. A suit that cost, at minimum, the price of at least three or even four Korean ladyboy prostitutes. An angry sneer. A small wooden cabin. And enough machine-pistol fire to actually light up the whole fucking room in flames. Hell yeah!

This is what real films are about - not dull grey backgrounds full of nuns and orphans crying, but about fun, violence, humour and... oh yes... ENTERTAINMENT. I know little about this new film Outrage, but I guarantee it will put smiles on people's faces, rather than leaving them confused or insulted, or with the depressive need to Seppuku once they leave the room.

Alex Billington of FirstShowing.net sums up the film nicely: "A few days ago I watched my first Takeshi Kitano film. I'm not sure why I haven't seen any of his previous films (he's directed quite a few), but I was excited to check out his newest Cannes entry Outrage, a modern Japanese mobster film that's literally just two hours of Yakuza yelling at each other and killing each other in brutal ways. But I'm now a Takeshi Kitano, or Beat Takeshi (as they call him in Japan), fan because I dug the hell out of this film. It's one of those totally badass Japanese mobster flicks that anyone can kick back and watch with friends and totally enjoy just because it's so damn crazy."

Yes there are films out there which have profound meanings which stir the soul, fire the senses and kick-start the imagination. There are true cinematic greats with profound messages that really do change the world, that leave audiences breathless, that really inspire and make people think about their lives and the world around them.
But, like with most art, for every masterpiece there are thousands of aborted celluloid turds floating around, stenching up the place and dizzying us all with their irrelevance.

Take for instance Mathieu Amalric's Tournee which, as I understand, is full of noteworthy actors doing a lot of crying. Rebecca H by Lodge Kerrigan was apparently a terrible movie, but Cannes audiences warmed to it anyhow because it was deep and contained quite a lot of crying.

Two Gates Of Sleep is according to Empire Magazine: "A wildly elliptical tale of two redneck brothers taking their dead mother to a remote burial ground, [the film] managed the incredible task of calling to mind the work of both David Lynch and Terrence Malick, whose styles you'd think might be mutually exclusive."

I have no idea what the hell any of that means, but I bet it was lengthy and involved a lot of crying. You get my drift - I'm sure all of these films are very impressive and important in their own way. But one question springs to mind - WHO were these movies made for? Would you actually drag your ass off the sofa to watch any of these? Really? Truthfully? Wouldn't it be more fun just to watch Bruce Willis patrolling a skyscraper and murdering lots of Germans instead?

The problem with Cannes and the wider world of arthouse cinema these days is the people that have come to embrace these films. Pretentious masses with a penchant for foreign accents and long films about women crying are clogging up the cinemas, creating a demand for fussy, idealistic crap that 20 years ago would have been left in script format, tidily filed with the rest in the trash.

We need to remember what films are about - fun. Yes, the artform has it's place, and in the right hands really can move mountains. But let's not forget the reason why films are made in the first place - for the people watching.

We need to remember, every once in a while, just to kick back, relax and BLOW SOME SHIT UP.

That is all, dear reader. Rant over. Crisis averted. I'll go and get my Ritalin now...


Click Click here to share or bookmark this page, fool! to share this page via Digg It, StumbleUpon, Facebook and all the rest of that trendy, shiny crap.

Click here to email a member of our team, especially if you're one of those whiney arthouse types whose ass we just kicked.

Click here to scribble in our guestbook. The stalkers who write there are far weirder than any film Cannes will ever showcase.

Click here to go back.

Click here to go back to the home page Click here to see our foolish and drunken attempts at humour Click here to read our humiliation of the worst cinematic abortions the movie industry has to offer Click here to see some of the most bizarre news the web's ever puked out

Click here to see the barrage of other crap we have lying around